Ontrol) versus all other ADAM11 Proteins medchemexpress groups highlighted a statistically very considerable hypotrophy in group HFBDR (p 0.01). In detail: R vs. RDS, HFBDR, HFEVODS had p significant hypertrophy in groups R-DS and HFEVO-DS (p 0.01) along with a statistically extremely important 0.01; RDS vs. RDR, HFBDS, HFBDR, HFEVODR had p 0.01; RDR vs. HFBDR, HFEVODS hypotrophy in group HFB-DR (p 0.01). In detail: R vs. R-DS, HFB-DR, HFEVO-DS had p 0.01; R-DS had, respectively, p 0.05 and p 0.01; HFBDS vs. HFBDR, HFEVODR had p 0.01; HFBDR vs. vs. R-DR, HFB-DS, HFB-DR, HFEVO-DR had p 0.01; R-DR vs. HFB-DR, HFEVO-DS had, respectively, HFEVODS had p 0.01; HFEVODS vs. HFEVODR had p 0.01 (Figure 2). Further analyses and p 0.05 and p 0.01; HFB-DS vs. HFB-DR, HFEVO-DR had p 0.01; HFB-DR vs. HFEVO-DS had comparisons among the groups are reported in the paragraph “Statistical evaluation of the p 0.01; HFEVO-DS vs. HFEVO-DR had p 0.01 (Figure two). Further analyses and comparisons involving histomorphometric results”.the groups are reported in the paragraph “Statistical analysis with the histomorphometric results”.Nutrients 2018, 10,Nutrients 2018, 10,7 of7 ofFigure two. Hematoxylin Eosin staining. Image analysis by computer software with morphometric evaluation with the the perimeter (m) of the muscle fibers (inserts) and a graph representing the mean values of the perimeter on the muscle fibers (inserts) and a graph representing the mean values on the perimeter perimeter (m) in every single group with statistical analysis (pvalues within the table). For facts, see the text. in each and every group with statistical analysis (p-values within the table). For facts, see the text. The data would be the data are presented as imply SD. Scale bars: 50 m. presented as imply SD. Scale bars: 50 .Figure two. Hematoxylin Eosin staining. Image evaluation by application with morphometric evaluation of3.four. Statistical Analysis in the Histomorphometric Final results The fiber perimeters correlated positively together with the dietary VitD content material (r = 0.603; p 0.001) and inversely with the dietary fat content material (r = -0.222; p 0.05). In our model, weight had no correlation The fiber perimeters correlated positively using the dietary VitD content (r = 0.603; p 0.001) and with muscle fiber perimeter (r = 0.003). A multiple linear regression was calculated to predict muscle inversely with all the dietary fat content material (r = -0.222; p 0.05). In our model, weight had no correlation fiber perimeter in relation to weight at the end of the experiment, VitD, and fat content material in diet regime. The with muscle fiber perimeter (r = 0.003). A a number of linear regression was calculated to predict muscle final results with the several linear regression E3 Ligases Proteins web indicated that there was a collective considerable connection fiber perimeter in relation to weight at the finish on the experiment, VitD, and fat content material in diet regime. two among the fiber perimeter, VitD, and dietary fat, (F = 34.827; p a collective important partnership The results of the many linear regression indicated that there was 0.001, r = 363). The person predictors have been examined additional, and indicated that dietary VitD (t = five.901; p 0.001) and dietary involving the fiber perimeter, VitD, and dietary fat, (F = 34.827; p 0.001, r2 = 363). The individual fat (t = -2.609; p 0.05) have been considerable predictors within the model.3.four. Statistical Analysis in the Histomorphometric Resultspredictors have been examined further, and indicated that dietary VitD (t = five.901; p 0.001) and dieta.