Eaf miner infestation, were chosen for the analyses, around the basis
Eaf miner infestation, were selected for the analyses, around the basis of our preliminary few-year observations. The very first group contained six lightly infested trees (LIT; Nos 1), whose fallen leaves have been removed consistently every autumn. The second group constituted nine heavily infested trees (HIT; Nos 75) whose leaves had been falling precociously and had been not removed. three of 17 In each years, the LIT and HIT have been sampled (Table 1; Table S1) In consideration of your high similarity with the results obtained in 2014 and 2015, these data have been treated collectively for the two-year Ziritaxestat supplier period, each for the lightly and for the Fifteen horse chestnut trees, developing in five locations along roads and in parks of heavily infested trees. Wroclaw, were chosen for analyses performed in 2014 and 2015 (Figure 1, Table 1). All trees had been repeatedly attacked byA. hippocastanum sampled miner, however with varied Table 1. Place of the analysed trees with the horse chestnut leaf in 2014 and 2015. degrees of leaf blade destruction plus the time of leaf shedding. Considering the fact that it’s known that leaf Year in autumn considerably improvesTrees (LIT) of trees and delays Trees (HIT) Lightly Infested the condition Heavily Infested attack by the pickingof Sampling trees 7 pest [391], two groups of trees DMPO Formula differing within the degree of leaf miner infestation, have been trees 1 51853.four N 16212.7 very first chosen for the analyses, on the basis of our preliminary few-year observations. The E 2014 group contained six lightly infested trees (LIT; Nos 1), whose fallen leaves had been removed 51728.1 N 16944.8 E trees 102 frequently each and every autumn. The second group constituted nine heavily infested trees (HIT; 51635.7 N 17446.eight E Nos 75) whose leaves had beentrees 4 falling precociously and had been not removed. In both trees 135 2015 years, the LIT and HIT have been sampledN 16944.8 E S1). 51801.four N 16050.six E 51728.1 (Table 1; TableFigure 1. Map showing the place from the study area; (a) the city of Wroclaw in a map of Europe; (b) magnification of Figure 1. Map displaying the location in the study area; (a) the city of Wroclaw inside a map of Europe; (b) magnification of Wroclaw with all the place in the study web pages; sampling areas are marked by filled dots and analysed trees are Wroclaw with all the place from the study web sites; sampling areas are marked by filled dots and analysed trees are numbered. numbered. Ready working with Google maps. Prepared using Google maps.Table 1. Place with the analysed trees of A. hippocastanum sampled in 2014 and 2015. Year of Sampling Lightly Infested Trees (LIT) trees 1 51 07 28.1 N 16 59 44.8 E trees four 51 07 28.1 N 16 59 44.eight E Heavily Infested Trees (HIT) trees 7 51 08 53.4 N 16 52 12.7 E trees 102 51 06 35.7 N 17 04 46.eight E trees 135 51 08 01.4 N 16 50 50.six EIn consideration on the higher similarity with the results obtained in 2014 and 2015, these data had been treated collectively for the two-year period, each for the lightly and for the heavily infested trees.Forests 2021, 12,4 of2.2. Phenological Observation The phenological phases regarded had been the following: dormant; bud swelling; leaf emerging; complete leaf unfolding; flowering; chestnut appearing; mature fruit; and leaf fall [42] and they had been observed concomitantly with micro-core sampling. The phenology of your trees was documented photographically and also the degree of infestation as a result of larval activity of C. ohridella was monitored in two unique groups of trees, LIT and HIT. Three diverse stages of infestation have been recognise.