F the primary nesiotic space of Seleucids, the maritime district of
F the principle nesiotic space of Seleucids, the maritime district of `Tylos and the islands’ (Kosmin 2013, p. 70).two The maritime district of the Persian Gulf strengthened the hold on the Seleucids over the area and reinforced connections between the islands.three The Seleucids, in order to consolidate their Alvelestat Purity presence on the island, erected a fortress (discovered at area F5), close to the ruins of a constructing, likely a temple-tower of an older civilisation and situated around the southwest corner of your island. This Pinacidil Data Sheet region formed a safe spot for the defence along with the protection from the island.four This enclosure was possibly constructed for the mercenaries of your Seleucid garrison, for the defence of your location and for the protection with the two temples erected therein and from the wells of fresh water5 that lay inside the fortification. Tiny islands in the Aegean also show Hellenistic fortifications. Inside the view of Constantakopoulou (2007, p. 198) `the Hellenistic towers found on a variety of islands may perhaps add to our understanding of the importance of islands for preserving connectivity inside the Aegean’. The identical is accurate for the fortress of Ikaros/Failaka, if we regard it as a part of a chain of fortifications or fortified temples erected within the Seleucid kingdom.Religions 2021, 12,7 ofOR PEER REVIEWThe island, though situated around the extremely edge of your Seleucid empire, was both connected with Seleucid military policies and formed a part of the Seleucid religious programme. As Canepa (2018, p. 172) notes, `the Seleucids, in effect, strategically designed a ritual stage and spatial context that tied the settlement for the Empire’. The erection of new temples, the use or the reuse of old regional temples and the manipulation of regional eastern traditions was 1 of most important objectives of Seleucids’ religious policy (Canepa 2018, p. 179). Thus, the island, which already had a long religious tradition, became subject to Seleucid religious policy and as a result part of a network of fortresses, temples and cities, like Jebel Khalid, Dura-Europus, Ai Khanum, Takht-e Sangin, and (most likely) Seleukeia-on-the-Tigris, where the Seleucids combined cultural components and practices of Babylonian, Persian of 17Greek ten and traditions, to create `a unifying focal point for both their Greco-Macedonian elites and pre-existing populations’ (Canepa 2018, p. 172) (Figure 3).Figure 3. Map on the Middle East displaying of Ikaros/Failaka. The map was developed by the author using Google Figure three. Map of your Middle East displaying the positionthe position of Ikaros/Failaka. The map was created by Earth author working with Google Earth Pro maps. the Pro maps.The temples, shrines and fortifications in these regions may have had a symbolic function. The places plus the way in which they have been erected throughout the Seleucid kingdom involving Greek and local traditions is dynasties a message of your cultural dialogue communicated to indigenous populations and localalso evident in theSeleucid dominion over a vast location (Freyberger 2016). These buildings also promoted and fortress, whose architectural structure and temples combine nearby architectural forms a notion of connectivity and unity in a varied ethnic atmosphere, with Babylonian and Achaemenid practices with Greek conventional architectural styles, thereby creatingGreco-Macedonian options, a hybrid cultural architectural practices and religious traditions blending with identity. The Hellenistic fortress stood on the cultural elements throughout the Middle East. same to creat.