In place with other associations, but from the graph it’s evident that some of them play a far more strategic part, each for the absolute quantity of active collaborations (Araucaria Viva), and for their ability to keep the network united (Coopfam and APOM) (Figure five).Figure 5. Collaborative network. Legend: Ties are binary and not oriented (symmetrized by the maximum), and represent E.2; nodes’ size represents C.4. Source: own construction.five.7.five. Level of Trust among OPAC-OSM Members (T.1) The trust network with the OPAC-OSM is fairly dense. There’s a tendency to place trust in incredibly proactive large partners (C.three) (RP.1 and RP.2) with whom you will find frequent exchanges of info, each inside and outside the OPAC-OSM (P.1 and E.1). Trust, however, is inversely proportional to the region IQP-0528 Cancer managed (C.five). This could be as a result of history of association and solidarity among smallholders, which, as a rule, gave rise to member organizations. These aspects are inclined to be weaker as farms get bigger (Figure six).Sustainability 2021, 13,15 ofFigure 6. Trust network. Legend: Ties are numeric (dichotomized by threshold 3) and oriented, and represent T.1; nodes’ size represents RP.1. Supply: Supply: own construction.six. Conclusions Our study began in the assumption that the OPAC, according to shared principles belonging to the PGS and structurally represented via a network, represents the tangible expression of SC. Then, aware that the existence of a network is actually a necessary but not sufficient condition for the formation of SC [39], we analyzed the intangible portion from the SC by focusing on the interaction among the members from the OPAC-OSM as a way to assess info flows, reputational energy, and also the amount of trust amongst members. We based our analysis around the individual members’ perception from the traits with the OPAC-OSM, its social organization and also the resulting advantages for the community of organic farmers that are portion of it. In light with the results obtained and with relation towards the query of no matter whether the OPAC-OSM has developed SC, we can answer affirmatively by linking it towards the effect in the horizontal structure from the network, and specifically the composition and behavior of network members. The size of reputational energy has highlighted a wealth of cooperative networks generated in unique by several of the network members (AAOF, Rama, Coopfam, Camponesa). It will be worth exploring in depth irrespective of whether the authoritativeness of those members comes from the possibility of mobilizing a lot more resources than other folks, or basically from the capacity to influence the judgment of other members. Considering the significantly less tangible side of SC [40], the study of relational skills permitted us to assess the degree of connection and density with the network. The trust network was the Tasisulam Purity & Documentation densest and most connected and underlines the internal expectations of the members from the OPAC-OSM about predictable, correct and cooperative behavior depending on frequently shared requirements. The partnership amongst SC and trust is extensively treated in the literature, though there is certainly no widespread hypothesis on whether or not trust can be a lead to, an impact or even a constituent issue of SC [41]. Within the case under study, it would seem that trust is definitely an impact of SC which has its roots in shared values, and in the very same time a constituent element fueled by the cooperative behavior of person members. In the trust network, what emerges could be the part assumed by some partners, such as the aforementioned AAOF,.