Tion of equal variance. The level of variance was continual across the sample; hence, an ANOVA test was performed. Table 1 shows the degree of burnout, CS, and PSMA in accordance with the common and job-related traits of your participants. The degree of burnout of your participants was larger in these without the need of religion (t = two.00, p = 0.047), these using a Cefuroxime-d3 Anti-infection college or bachelor’s degree (F = 3.14, p = 0.045), and individuals who did not exercising. It was larger inside the case of not (t = three.41, p = 0.001). Subjective well being status was poor (F = ten.96, p 0.001). Internal medicine ward workers (F = 3.13, p = 0.009) and participants with high subjective job stress (F = 28.67, p 0.001) showed a higher burnout score. The degree of CS was higher in married people (t = -2.38, p = 0.018) than in single persons, participants with religious affiliation (t = -3.08, p = 0.002), and in those with a master’s degree or larger (t = three.39, p = 0.035). Participants with fantastic subjective well being (F = three.61, p = 0.028), charge nurses instead of employees nurses (t = -2.05, p = 0.042), and participants with Carboxin-d5 In Vivo significantly less subjective job anxiety (F = five.13, p = 0.006) showed higher CS. The PSMA level was identified to be larger in participants who exercised consistently (t = -2.36, p = 0.019) and people that had less subjective job stress (F = six.01, p = 0.003) (Table 1). three.3. Participant’s Burnout, CS, and PSMA Level Table two shows the burnout, CS, and PSMA levels in the participants. The scores for the sub-areas of PSMA in line with subjective job pressure are shown in Figure 1 (converted to a 5-point scale), and the domains with heavy job anxiety and low PSMA scores had been medication management and security atmosphere management (Figure 1).Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Overall health 2021, 18, 12210 Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Well being 2021, 18, x FOR PEER REVIEW6 of 12 7 ofTable two. Levels of burnout, CS, and PSMA of shift nurses (N = 301). Table two. Levels of burnout, CS, and PSMA of shift nurses (N = 301). Variables (Item Range) Variables (Item Variety)M M SD SD 29.8929.89 five.16 5.16 29.6129.61 6.55 6.55 183.92 25.22 183.92 25.Range Range Min-Max Min-Max 129 129 110 110 10830 108Burnout (10-50) Burnout (10-50) CS (10-50) CS (10-50) PSMA (46-230) PSMA (46-230)M, mean; SD, typical deviation; CS, compassion satisfaction; PSMA, patient security management activities.M, imply; SD, normal deviation; CS, compassion satisfaction; PSMA, patient security management activities.Amount of subjective job stressHeavyModerateLight5 4.2 4 4.15 four.02 three.76 four.04 3.58 4.22 4.28 four.14 3.ScoreFigure 1. The scores for the sub-areas of PSMA according to the subjective job anxiety level. Figure 1. The scores for the sub-areas of PSMA in line with the subjective job stress level.3.4. CorrelationsamongBurnout, CS, and PSMA The correlations amongst burnout, CS, and PSMA from the participants are presented in Table three. Burnout and CS showed a considerable negative correlation (r = -0.66, p 0.001). three. CS showed a significant adverse correlation (r = -0.66, p 0.001). PSMA was negatively correlated with burnout (r = -0.32, p 0.001) and positively correburnout (r = -0.32, p 0.001) and positively correlated with CS (r = 0.32, p 0.001). 0.001).Table 3. Correlations amongst burnout, CS, and PSMA (N = 301).Variables Burnout CSBurnout r (p) 1 -0.66 (0.001)CS r (p)PSMA r (p)Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18,7 ofTable 3. Correlations among burnout, CS, and PSMA (N = 301). Variables Burnout CS PSMA Burnout r (p) 1 -0.66 (0.001) -0.32 (0.001) CS r (p) 1 0.32 (0.001).