I: Initial autophagic Telatinib PDGFR vacuole; AVd: degradative autophagic vacuole; M: mitochondrion; Nu: nucleus; NM: Sacubitril/Valsartan manufacturer nuclear membrane; PM: plasma membrane. Bars: 1 , 200 nm. Original blots see Figure S4.Cancers 2021, 13,14 of3.five. PKC Signaling Interferes with Autophagy Converging on ERK1/2 Pathway To clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying the involvement of PKC in the autophagic course of action, we focused our interest on MTOR, that is deemed the primary unfavorable regulator of autophagy also in pancreatic cancer cells [2,14]. Western blot analysis revealed that the phosphorylation of MTOR, also as that of its substrate S6K, evident right after FGF2 stimulation specifically in PANC-1 cells (Figure 6A), were strongly dampened by PKC knockdown (Figure 6A). Surprisingly, no corresponding effects were observed around the AKT phosphorylation (Figure 6B). Because AKT may be the upstream substrate usually accountable for MTOR activation, our unexpected outcomes indicated that PKC could possibly activate MTOR by way of an alternative pathway. This possibility appears to become consistent using the peculiar capacity, previously described for PKC in other cellular contexts, to converge on MTOR by means of the activation of Raf/MEK/ERK signaling [25]. Truly, the crucial contribution of ERK1/2 signaling in MTOR activation and consequent autophagy inhibition has been widely described in pancreatic cancer cells [2]. Based on these assumptions, we investigated the effect of PKC signaling on ERK1/2 pathway. Biochemical evaluation showed that, in consequence of PKC depletion, the increase of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to FGF2, visible in each pancreatic cell lines (Figure 6C), was reduced in Mia PaCa-2, which maintained a considerable residual ERK phosphorylation (Figure 6C), but completely abolished in PANC-1 (Figure 6C). The se outcomes indicate that the diverse expression of FGFR2c displayed by the two PDAC cell lines influence on the dependence on PKC of ERK1/2 signaling. It is also worth noting that shFGFR2c transduced MiaPaCa-2 cells displayed a greater responsiveness to FGF2 when it comes to ERK1/2 phosphorylation when compared with non-transduced ones (see Figure 1B in comparison with Figure 6C), even though this phosphorylation remains drastically decrease than that shown by PANC-1 cells. This variability of MiaPaCa-2 cell response to FGF2 could possibly be the consequence of different culture circumstances. The se outcomes indicated that, only in PANC-1 cells, the activation of ERK1/2 pathway upstream will depend on PKC activation. Considering the fact that ERK1/2 is also a wellknown pathway involved in EMT of PDAC cells [4], our final results suggest the possibility that, within this tumor context, PKC signaling, when activated in consequence of highly expression of FGFR2c, could simultaneously repress autophagy and orchestrate the EMT system straight converging on ERK1/2 pathway.Cancers 2021, 13,15 ofFigure 6. PKC signaling shut-off by PKC protein depletion interferes with both MTOR and ERK1/2 signaling pathways. PANC-1 and Mia PaCa-2 cells stably transduced with PKC shRNA or with an unrelated shRNA were left untreated or stimulated with FGF2 as above. (A) Western blot evaluation shows that the enhance of phosphorylation of MTOR and S6K, evident immediately after FGF2 stimulation only in PANC-1 cells, are strongly dampened by PKC knockdown. (B) No correspondingCancers 2021, 13,16 ofeffects are observed around the AKT phosphorylation. (C) The enhance of ERK1/2 phosphorylation in response to FGF2, visible in both pancreatic cell lines, is considerably greater.