Ptibility [COR = 0.59 95 CI (0.4, 0.89)]. Students who had high selfefficacy have been additional most likely to possess intention to work with C-DIM12 web condom than those obtaining PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21296415 low self efficacy [COR = 29.0 95 CI (15.3, 55.two)]. These students who’ve higher perceived barrier were much more most likely to possess intention to use condom [COR = 2.28 95 CI (1.53-3.four)] than people who have low perceived barrier (Table five). Right after adjusting for the other variables the multivariate evaluation revealed that those that have high perceived susceptibility to HIVAIDS have been a lot more most likely to possess intention to make use of condom [AOR = 1.94 95 CI (1.16-3.two)] when compared with their counter components and those that have higher self efficacy have more likely to possess intention touse condom [AOR = 27 95 CI (14.4-54.two)] than others (Table six).Discussion HIVAIDS is identified to become the major challenges of creating nations. Nonetheless it truly is considerably extra difficult in sub-Saharan Africa affecting specifically the productive segments of their population. Hence, it was in line with this truth that a cross sectional study performed in Agena preparatory college students concerning their present risky sexual behaviours and condom use intention working with overall health behaviour model. The study investigated distinctive factors for example socio-demographic traits and psychosocial factors in relation to their effect around the use of condom and condom use intention. One particular fourth from the study participants had sexual exposure and it was discovered to be larger amongst males (76.two Vs 23.eight ). The prevalence of condom use (73.1 ) amongst people who have sexual intercourse within the previous one year was greater than the study completed at Gondar College ofTable five Partnership with the theoretical constructs with intention to utilize condom among students of Agena preparatory college, Guraghe zone, Ethiopia,Variable Age 159 205 Sex Male Female Educational status Grade 11 Grade 12 Perceived Susceptibility Low High Perceived Severity Low High Perceived advantage Low Higher Perceived barrier Low Higher Self efficacy Low Higher 12 138 (92 ) (eight ) 215 85 (29.three ) (71.7 ) 1 29 (15.35) 91 59 (60.7 ) (39.3 ) 121 179 (80.7 ) (19.three ) 1 two.28 (1.53.4) 86 64 (57.3 ) (42.7 ) 161 139 (53.7 ) (42.three ) 1 0.86 (0.58.3) 89 61 (59.3 ) (40.7 ) 150 150 (50 ) (50 ) 1 0.68 (0.46) 93 57 (62 ) (38 ) 148 152 (49.three) (50.7 ) 1 0.59 (0.4.89) 79 71 (47.three ) (52.7 ) 137 163 (45.7 ) (54.3 ) 1 0.75 (0.51.19) 122 (81 ) 38 (19 ) 166 134 (55.three ) (44.7 ) two.37 (1.54.66) 1 141 (94 ) 9 (six ) 269 31 (ten.three ) (89.7 ) 1.eight (0.83.89) 1 Intention to work with condom No intention to make use of condom COR (Crude Odd Ratio) 95 CI = p-value 0.0001 = p-value 0.05.Gselassie et al. Archives of Public Overall health 2013, 71:23 http:www.archpublichealth.comcontent711Page 7 ofTable 6 Odds ratios from logistic regression models predicting intention to make use of condom among students in Agena preparatory school, Guraghe zone, Ethiopia,Variable Sex Male Female Educational Status Grade 11 Grade 12 Perceived Susceptibility Low Higher Perceived Barrier Low Higher Self efficacy Low High 12 138 (92 ) (8 ) 215 (71.7 ) 85 (29.3 ) 1 29 (15.35) 1 27 (14.44.two) 91 59 (60.7 ) (39.3 ) 121 (80.7 ) 179 (19.3 ) 1 2.28 (1.53.four) 1 1.53 (0.92.54) 93 57 (62 ) (38 ) 148 (49.3 ) 152 (50.7 ) 1 0.59 (0.4.89) 1 1.94 (1.16.two) 79 71 (52.7 ) (47.3 ) 137 (45.7 ) 163 (54.3 ) 1 0.75 (0.51.19) 1 1.41 (0.85.34) 122 (81 ) 38 (19 ) 166 (55.three ) 134 (44.7 ) two.37 (1.54.66) 1 1.31 (0.76.36) 1 Intention to work with condom No intention to use condom COR (Crude Odd Ratio) 95 CI AOR (Adjusted Odd Ratio) 95 CI = p-value 0.0001 = p-value 0.05.