Ofessional training (22,23). Such cultural differences often result in a detrimental discrepancy between the problem conceptualization, needs, and expectations of get AZD0156 patients and clinicians. This generally attenuates communication and effectiveness of treatment, thereby leading to high unexplained dropout rates (24). In support of this, empirical evidence suggests that patients are most satisfied and adhere to treatment when their treatment provider recognizes and shares their problem conceptualization and presents interventions that suit their needs and expectations (23,25,26). To prevent poorer health results for minority patients, the exploration of such sociocultural differences between patients and clinicians must occur. Hence, the role of culture in the development, maintenance, and management of mental disorders should be recognized as an important step in improving mental health care for culturally diverse (Turkish) minority patients.The aforementioned cultural dimensions can be conceptualized as world views that determine beliefs, attitudes, norms, roles, values, and behaviors in different cultures (32,33). Of these, the most popular is the view of individualism-collectivism, which basically refers to how people define themselves and their relationships with others. On the individualist side, we find societies [e.g., Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, Quinagolide (hydrochloride)MedChemExpress CV205-502 hydrochloride Sweden (34,35)], in which the individuals view themselves as independent of one another. Likewise, according to Hofstede’s definition, individualism reflects a focus on rights above duties, a concern for oneself and one’s immediate family, an emphasis on personal autonomy, self-fulfillment, and personal accomplishments (29). On the other side, the main characteristic of collectivism is the conjecture that people are integrated into cohesive ingroups, often extended families, which provide affinity in exchange for unquestioned loyalty (33). Similarly, Schwartz (35) defines collectivist societies (e.g., Turkey, Lebanon, Morocco) as communal societies characterized by mutual obligations and expectations based on ascribed positions in the social hierarchy (34). There is some evidence that cultural orientations have implications for psychological processes such as self-concepts, motivation sources, emotional expression, and attribution styles (31). Correspondingly, a large body of clinical research demonstrates that these psychological processes are also associated with etiology, maintenance, and management of depression and present important targets of psychotherapeutic interventions.THE SELF AS A CULTURAL PRODUCTSeveral studies have demonstrated that a major cultural influence on depressive experience is the concept of self- or personhood as defined by a particular cultural orientation (36,37,38). The “self” has been conceptualized within a social-cognitive framework as a manifold, dynamic system of constructs, i.e., a constellation of cognitive schemas (39,40,41). According to Beck’s cognitive theory, depression is caused by negative depressogenic cognitive schemata that predispose an individual to become depressed when stressful events or losses occur (42). These depressogenic cognitive schemas involve a negative outlook on the self, the future, and the world. As defined by theory and numerous studies on depression, self-view plays a crucial role in the development and maintenance of depression. However, it has been widely acknowledged by cross-cultural researchers, that the nature of.Ofessional training (22,23). Such cultural differences often result in a detrimental discrepancy between the problem conceptualization, needs, and expectations of patients and clinicians. This generally attenuates communication and effectiveness of treatment, thereby leading to high unexplained dropout rates (24). In support of this, empirical evidence suggests that patients are most satisfied and adhere to treatment when their treatment provider recognizes and shares their problem conceptualization and presents interventions that suit their needs and expectations (23,25,26). To prevent poorer health results for minority patients, the exploration of such sociocultural differences between patients and clinicians must occur. Hence, the role of culture in the development, maintenance, and management of mental disorders should be recognized as an important step in improving mental health care for culturally diverse (Turkish) minority patients.The aforementioned cultural dimensions can be conceptualized as world views that determine beliefs, attitudes, norms, roles, values, and behaviors in different cultures (32,33). Of these, the most popular is the view of individualism-collectivism, which basically refers to how people define themselves and their relationships with others. On the individualist side, we find societies [e.g., Germany, the Netherlands, the UK, Sweden (34,35)], in which the individuals view themselves as independent of one another. Likewise, according to Hofstede’s definition, individualism reflects a focus on rights above duties, a concern for oneself and one’s immediate family, an emphasis on personal autonomy, self-fulfillment, and personal accomplishments (29). On the other side, the main characteristic of collectivism is the conjecture that people are integrated into cohesive ingroups, often extended families, which provide affinity in exchange for unquestioned loyalty (33). Similarly, Schwartz (35) defines collectivist societies (e.g., Turkey, Lebanon, Morocco) as communal societies characterized by mutual obligations and expectations based on ascribed positions in the social hierarchy (34). There is some evidence that cultural orientations have implications for psychological processes such as self-concepts, motivation sources, emotional expression, and attribution styles (31). Correspondingly, a large body of clinical research demonstrates that these psychological processes are also associated with etiology, maintenance, and management of depression and present important targets of psychotherapeutic interventions.THE SELF AS A CULTURAL PRODUCTSeveral studies have demonstrated that a major cultural influence on depressive experience is the concept of self- or personhood as defined by a particular cultural orientation (36,37,38). The “self” has been conceptualized within a social-cognitive framework as a manifold, dynamic system of constructs, i.e., a constellation of cognitive schemas (39,40,41). According to Beck’s cognitive theory, depression is caused by negative depressogenic cognitive schemata that predispose an individual to become depressed when stressful events or losses occur (42). These depressogenic cognitive schemas involve a negative outlook on the self, the future, and the world. As defined by theory and numerous studies on depression, self-view plays a crucial role in the development and maintenance of depression. However, it has been widely acknowledged by cross-cultural researchers, that the nature of.