E 5 most frequently described criteria were relevance of analysis topic to institution’s targets, mission and priority; scientific merit; extensive overview of literature and reports; ethical review; and project price range. In response to questions in regards to the written policies or guidelines for the scientific evaluation of proposals, 165 of respondent institutions (67 ) stated that their written criteria addressed ethical review. Only 190 of respondent institutions (29 ) had a standing or established scientific assessment committee that met on a regular basis. Of these, 157 institutions reported that the committee had explicit standard operating procedures. Only 169 (28 ) of respondent institutions had a written policy requiring research projects to be evaluated when in progress; the proportion requiring them to become evaluated following the study was completed was only slightly larger (33 ). Over 80 in the respondents stated that a national policy on analysis ethics existed and that institutions are needed to adopt national policies. About half of the institutions had a policy on investigation ethics that also covers investigation carried out by employees elsewhere (Table four). The majority of these institutions37354Number of respondent overall health institutions, out of 847 surveyed.Kebede et al.Table 2. Forms and approaches to investigation in institutions conducting health investigation in 42 sub-Saharan nations, 2009. Overall health study institution Form of study Kind of research Sorts of research (n 659) Applied Experimental development Standard or fundamental Fields of science and technology (n 698) Overall health sciences Clinical medicine Biological sciences Biomedical Social sciences Chemical sciences Mathematicscomputer sciences Agricultural sciences Physical sciences Engineering and technologies Humanities Places of analysis (n 847) Tuberculosis, HIV AIDS or malaria Other communicable maternal nutritional conditions Well being solutions delivery research Variables outside of wellness systems and social determinants of overall health 468 55 460 263 259 225 230 112 95 66 38 37 32 33 16 14 Innovative practices and solutions improvement Injuries: unintentional or intentional Study design and style (n 596) Cross-sectional study Case study 96 78 73 14 11 10 Cohort study Case ontrol study Participant observation study Beforeafter study Oral history or biographical study Experimental trial Time series Non-randomised controlled trial 388 46 Naturalistic study 382 64 175 21 576 302 87 46 Non-communicable diseases 279 42 Wellness impact Non-health consequences of illness or disability 220 196 26 23 219 26 No. Well being policy and systems analysis Disease wellness monitoring surveillance No. 307 36 Table 2. Continued. Health study institution318 276 26353 46 4423740157 12526 CP-456773 sodium 21Number of respondent wellness institutions, out of 847 surveyed.(continued)Journal with the Royal Society of Medicine 107(1S)Figure 1. Priorities of health investigation institutions for contributing to or performing study within the WHO African Region, 2009.Table 3. Scientific overview of investigation in wellness study institutions in the WHO African Region, 2009. Health study institutions Characteristics of critique Practices and policies Scientific review of proposed analysis funded directly by the institution Scientific PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2129546 critique of proposed research not funded by the institution Existence of written policies or guidelines on scientific evaluation of proposals Existence of written policies or guidelines on conflict of interest on scientific assessment committees Review criteria (n 248).