Every of the 3 intervals. In Table 2 we report the median
Every single of the three intervals. In Table two we report the median, the first quartile (Q) and the third quartile (Q3) for each subgroup along with the resultsTable 2. Statistics for egocentric network sizes of distinct trait subgroups. The median, the first quartile (Q) as well as the third quartile (Q3) for each and every subgroup are reported. We performed the HDAC-IN-3 site KruskalWallis test (KW) plus the KolmogorovSmirnov test (KS) as a way to assess eventual variations involving the distributions of your reference distances of opposite subgroups (e.g. extroverts and introverts). Only the KruskalWallis (KW) and KolmogorovSmirnov (KS) tests with p 0.05 are reported. Median Openness to Experience Extraversion Agreeableness Conscientiousness Emotional Stability High Low High Low Higher Low Higher Low High Low p 0.05. p 0.0. p 0.00. doi:0.37journal.pone.0730.t002 75.5 86.0 79.0 7.0 80.0 66.0 78.0 67.0 84.0 79.0 Q 53.8 66.0 60.0 57.0 six.0 54.0 57.0 48.5 60.5 57.0 Q3 89.0 four.0 3.0 90.0 95.0 84.0 92.0 84.0 2.five 99.0 6.five 0.29 four.74 KW KSPLOS A single DOI:0.37journal.pone.0730 March two,7 Personality traits and egonetwork dynamicsTable 3. Selfdistances of social signatures within subgroups. The median, the initial quartile (Q) and also the third quartile (Q3) for each subgroup are reported. We performed the KruskalWallis test (KW) as well as the KolmogorovSmirnov test (KS) in an effort to assess eventual variations among the distributions of your self distances of opposite subgroups (e.g. extroverts and introverts). Median Openness to Encounter Extraversion Agreeableness 
Conscientiousness Emotional Stability High Low Higher Low High Low Higher Low Higher Low p 0.05. p 0.0. p 0.00. doi:0.37journal.pone.0730.t003 0.02 0.08 0.022 0.08 0.022 0.025 0.020 0.022 0.022 0.09 Q 0.07 0.05 0.09 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.07 0.07 Q3 0.04 0.026 0.034 0.022 0.034 0.035 0.033 0.036 0.033 0.024 5.27 KW KSwith a significance degree of p 0.05; for these character traits, network sizes are significantly distinct for the 25th and 75th percentiles, that is definitely the trait does have an effect on network size. The median values from the network size distribution of subgroups of persons with high and low scores in the Agreeableness character trait, show statistically substantial variations, with median network sizes of 80.0 and 66.0, respectively. The subgroups of folks with high and low scores inside the Openness to Expertise trait possess a median network size of 75.five and 86.0, respectively, however they show a important statistical difference only with all the KruskalWallis test. Non significant differences are located between the subgroups in the other 3 personality traits (Extraversion, Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability).Character traits and the persistence of social signaturesHere, we attempt to understand the relationship between the persistence of a social signature along with the Big Five personality traits. We investigate whether the selfdistances of subgroups of opposite character traits (e.g. extroverts and introverts) exhibit variations, which would indicate that the signatures are extra persistent for one particular group than for the other. We thus try to know no matter if a particular character disposition influences the stability of a person signature more than time. We obtain a important distinction only in the distributions on the selfdistances in the subgroups of extroverts and introverts, namely people with PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28125238 higher and low scores inside the Extraversion personality trait: the signatures of extroverts are significantly less persistent than the signatur.