H increased risk of lymph node metastasis, higher FIGO stage, higher histological grade, and lower 5-year OS and DFS rate. These findingsPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229 May 19,12 /Gynecological Cancer Associated with HIF-1 Expression: Meta-AnalysisFig 6. Forest plot of the expression of HIF-1 in Grade 3 tissue versus that in Grade 1 tissue. (I2 = 42 ). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229.grevealed that HIF-1 could be considered as a hallmark of tumour progression, and a prognostic factor for gynecological cancer. To reveal the mechanisms, bmjopen-2015-010112 several included studies of this meta-analysis reported that HIF-1 is related to many critical aspects of gynecological cancer biology. HIF-1 synthesis could be increased by several purchase Caspase-3 Inhibitor growth factors, cytokines and other signaling molecules responsible for stimulating phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) or mitogenactivated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways [38]. The regulated markers of HIF-1, such as glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT1), carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) and c-Met, have been found to be highly associated with poor prognosis in various cancers [38]. HIF-1 also regulates manyPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229 May 19,13 /Gynecological Cancer Associated with HIF-1 Expression: Meta-AnalysisFig 7. Forest plot of the expression of HIF-1 in Grade 3 tissue versus that in Grade 2 tissue. (I2 = 13 ). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229.gcancer signaling pathways, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Notch, and Myc, to mediate tumor proliferation, invasion and migration [2, 8, 9, 16, 27, 30, 52, 57, 70]. However, the association between HIF-1 and the clinicopathologic features was not observed in subgroup analyses of “Grade 3 vs. Grade 2” in endometrial and cervical cancers. When stratified by cancer type, results of survival analysis were not statistically significant in the “endometrial and ovarian cancer” subgroup. We suggested that besides the heterogeneity of included studies, other factors related to clinicopathologic features of gynecological cancer might contribute to this inconsistence. For example, type I endometrial cancer is often characterized byPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229 May 19,14 /Gynecological Cancer Associated with HIF-1 Expression: Meta-AnalysisFig 8. Forest plot of the expression of HIF-1 in Grade 2 tissue versus that in Grade 1 tissue. srep43317 (I2 = 6 ). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229.gmutations in tumor suppressor PTEN, while type II endometrial cancer generally contains the mutation of another tumor suppressor p53 [71?4]. In cervical cancer, the overexpression of human papillomavirus (HPV) and the loss of p53 promote tumor invasion and metastasis [75]. Thus, further studies included both HIF-1 and other factors are warranted to GGTI298 web validate our findings, and to unravel the mechanism of carcinogenesis and progression in gynecological cancer. Some limitations should be acknowledged. First, immunohistochemistry was a semiquantitative method, and this may affect the precision of the result. In this meta-analysis, noPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229 May 19,15 /Gynecological Cancer Associated with HIF-1 Expression: Meta-AnalysisFig 9. Forest plot of association between HIF-1 expression and lymph node metastasis. (I2 = 71 ). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229.gsubgroup survival analysis was performed for different histological subtypes. Differences in primary antibodies, immunohistochemistry staining protocols, evaluation standards, and cut-off values for high HIF-1 expression.H increased risk of lymph node metastasis, higher FIGO stage, higher histological grade, and lower 5-year OS and DFS rate. These findingsPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229 May 19,12 /Gynecological Cancer Associated with HIF-1 Expression: Meta-AnalysisFig 6. Forest plot of the expression of HIF-1 in Grade 3 tissue versus that in Grade 1 tissue. (I2 = 42 ). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229.grevealed that HIF-1 could be considered as a hallmark of tumour progression, and a prognostic factor for gynecological cancer. To reveal the mechanisms, bmjopen-2015-010112 several included studies of this meta-analysis reported that HIF-1 is related to many critical aspects of gynecological cancer biology. HIF-1 synthesis could be increased by several growth factors, cytokines and other signaling molecules responsible for stimulating phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) or mitogenactivated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways [38]. The regulated markers of HIF-1, such as glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT1), carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) and c-Met, have been found to be highly associated with poor prognosis in various cancers [38]. HIF-1 also regulates manyPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229 May 19,13 /Gynecological Cancer Associated with HIF-1 Expression: Meta-AnalysisFig 7. Forest plot of the expression of HIF-1 in Grade 3 tissue versus that in Grade 2 tissue. (I2 = 13 ). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229.gcancer signaling pathways, including PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Notch, and Myc, to mediate tumor proliferation, invasion and migration [2, 8, 9, 16, 27, 30, 52, 57, 70]. However, the association between HIF-1 and the clinicopathologic features was not observed in subgroup analyses of “Grade 3 vs. Grade 2” in endometrial and cervical cancers. When stratified by cancer type, results of survival analysis were not statistically significant in the “endometrial and ovarian cancer” subgroup. We suggested that besides the heterogeneity of included studies, other factors related to clinicopathologic features of gynecological cancer might contribute to this inconsistence. For example, type I endometrial cancer is often characterized byPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229 May 19,14 /Gynecological Cancer Associated with HIF-1 Expression: Meta-AnalysisFig 8. Forest plot of the expression of HIF-1 in Grade 2 tissue versus that in Grade 1 tissue. srep43317 (I2 = 6 ). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229.gmutations in tumor suppressor PTEN, while type II endometrial cancer generally contains the mutation of another tumor suppressor p53 [71?4]. In cervical cancer, the overexpression of human papillomavirus (HPV) and the loss of p53 promote tumor invasion and metastasis [75]. Thus, further studies included both HIF-1 and other factors are warranted to validate our findings, and to unravel the mechanism of carcinogenesis and progression in gynecological cancer. Some limitations should be acknowledged. First, immunohistochemistry was a semiquantitative method, and this may affect the precision of the result. In this meta-analysis, noPLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229 May 19,15 /Gynecological Cancer Associated with HIF-1 Expression: Meta-AnalysisFig 9. Forest plot of association between HIF-1 expression and lymph node metastasis. (I2 = 71 ). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127229.gsubgroup survival analysis was performed for different histological subtypes. Differences in primary antibodies, immunohistochemistry staining protocols, evaluation standards, and cut-off values for high HIF-1 expression.