The self is culturally constructed (43,44,45,46). Both cultural dimensions (individualism vs. collectivism) value personal traits that reflect their predominant goals and, thus, assign different components of the self as central aspects of identity (e.g., independence vs. interdependence) (47,48,49). For instance, Western European societies sustain an individualistic model of a person as endorsed by their theories of personality and LY2510924 site social psychology (48,50). This model of the person influences an individual’s self-view, resulting in the development of an independent self-construal (48). However, the individualistic, independent model of the self fails to describe the self-concepts of all people. Cross-cultural research has revealed that members of many collectivistic cultures, such as Turkey, see the person as part of the social network, rather than as a unique individual. Therefore, members of such societies tend to construct an interdependent self-construal (48). Given that the conceptualization of the self has been shown to vary across cultures, members of individualistic and collectivistic societies may differ in personality (self-hood) characteristics, from which they BX795MedChemExpress BX795 derive their feelings of self-worth, i.e., self-esteem, to maintain a positive view of themselves (51). Consequently, the relationship between different characteristics of the self and depressive experience may vary as a function of cultural orientation. Correspondingly, Markus and Kitayama argued that the positive view of the self, which people need to maintain to derive feelings of self-worth, differs according to their self-construals (48,51,52). Individuals holding an independent self-construal sustain a positive view of themselves when they are in control, assert themselves, and achieve success. For individuals with interdependent self-construals, maintaining a positive self-view requires fulfilling social obligations and main-LINKING CULTURE AND PSYCHOLOGYAlthough in the literature, too many cooks spoil the broth in defining culture, in the current paper, the term refers to a shared, learned system of values, beliefs, and attitudes that shape and influence perception and behavior (27,28). It is suggested that such collective programming of the mind distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from others. The most popular model for comparing and contrasting cultural orientations is Hofstede’s model of national culture, which consists of six dimensions (e.g., power distance, individualism vs. collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity vs. femininity, long-term orientation vs. short-term orientation, indulgence vs. restraint) (29). This does not imply that everyone in a given society is programmed in the same manner; there are considerable differences between individuals (30). Nevertheless, upon its conception, Hofstede’s model was important because it organized cultural differences into tangible and measurable patterns, which promoted the understanding of how culture relates to psychological processes in a systematic manner (31).Balkir Neft et al. Depression Among Turkish Patients in EuropeArch Neuropsychiatr 2016; 53: 72-taining harmony with the group to gain social acceptance (21). In support of this argument, a recent study has revealed that a highly interdependent self-construal is related to lower psychological distress in Asian-American university students, whereas there was a positive correlation in European-Americans (53). However,.The self is culturally constructed (43,44,45,46). Both cultural dimensions (individualism vs. collectivism) value personal traits that reflect their predominant goals and, thus, assign different components of the self as central aspects of identity (e.g., independence vs. interdependence) (47,48,49). For instance, Western European societies sustain an individualistic model of a person as endorsed by their theories of personality and social psychology (48,50). This model of the person influences an individual’s self-view, resulting in the development of an independent self-construal (48). However, the individualistic, independent model of the self fails to describe the self-concepts of all people. Cross-cultural research has revealed that members of many collectivistic cultures, such as Turkey, see the person as part of the social network, rather than as a unique individual. Therefore, members of such societies tend to construct an interdependent self-construal (48). Given that the conceptualization of the self has been shown to vary across cultures, members of individualistic and collectivistic societies may differ in personality (self-hood) characteristics, from which they derive their feelings of self-worth, i.e., self-esteem, to maintain a positive view of themselves (51). Consequently, the relationship between different characteristics of the self and depressive experience may vary as a function of cultural orientation. Correspondingly, Markus and Kitayama argued that the positive view of the self, which people need to maintain to derive feelings of self-worth, differs according to their self-construals (48,51,52). Individuals holding an independent self-construal sustain a positive view of themselves when they are in control, assert themselves, and achieve success. For individuals with interdependent self-construals, maintaining a positive self-view requires fulfilling social obligations and main-LINKING CULTURE AND PSYCHOLOGYAlthough in the literature, too many cooks spoil the broth in defining culture, in the current paper, the term refers to a shared, learned system of values, beliefs, and attitudes that shape and influence perception and behavior (27,28). It is suggested that such collective programming of the mind distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from others. The most popular model for comparing and contrasting cultural orientations is Hofstede’s model of national culture, which consists of six dimensions (e.g., power distance, individualism vs. collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity vs. femininity, long-term orientation vs. short-term orientation, indulgence vs. restraint) (29). This does not imply that everyone in a given society is programmed in the same manner; there are considerable differences between individuals (30). Nevertheless, upon its conception, Hofstede’s model was important because it organized cultural differences into tangible and measurable patterns, which promoted the understanding of how culture relates to psychological processes in a systematic manner (31).Balkir Neft et al. Depression Among Turkish Patients in EuropeArch Neuropsychiatr 2016; 53: 72-taining harmony with the group to gain social acceptance (21). In support of this argument, a recent study has revealed that a highly interdependent self-construal is related to lower psychological distress in Asian-American university students, whereas there was a positive correlation in European-Americans (53). However,.