Fering LurbinectedinMedChemExpress PM01183 resilience Hypothesis. To examine the interactive effects in more detail, we estimated the magnitude of the simple slopes (Preacher, Curran, Bauer, 2006) between economic pressure and hostility for different levels of effective problem solving (- 1 SD = low problem-solving couples; mean = average problem-solving couples; + 1 SD = high problemsolving couples). For both G1 and G2, simple slope estimates revealed that the slope for T2 hostility regressed on T1 economic pressure for SC144 manufacturer couples with high levels of effective problem-solving skills (i.e., + 1 SD) was not significantly different than zero (i.e., it was flat; see Figure 4, online supplementary material). That is, for high problem-solving couples, economic pressure did not predict increases in hostile behavioral exchanges over time. For average problem-solving couples, economic pressure predicted moderate relative increasesJ Marriage Fam. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Masarik et al.Pagein couple hostility and low problem-solving couples demonstrated the largest increases in hostility over time as a function of economic pressure. Consistent with Hypothesis 3, when economic pressure was high, low problem-solving couples displayed the greatest relative increases in hostility over time whereas high problem solvers displayed no change in hostility. That is, couples’ effective problem solving provided a source of buffering resilience to economic pressure.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptDiscussionPast research has demonstrated that economic difficulties are concurrently associated with lower perceived romantic relationship quality and stability (e.g., Conger et al., 1990; Dew Yorgason, 2010; Hardie Lucas, 2010; Johnson Booth, 1990; Williamson et al., 2013); yet much less is known about actual behavioral exchanges that unfold over time in response to economic stress. Moreover, we know very little about particular relationship skills or characteristics that might directly compensate or buffer couples from experiencing relationship distress in the context of economic problems. These kinds of empirical investigations are needed to both increase theoretical understanding of the processes involved and to inform prevention and intervention programs that can assist families in difficult economic situations. To guide the development of our study hypotheses, we relied on theoretical predictions outlined by the Family Stress Model (e.g., Conger Conger, 2002; Conger et al., 2010). We used prospective longitudinal data involving two generations of romantic couples and assessed the degree of replication for the hypothesized economic stress and couple resilience processes across generations. In testing our study hypotheses, we controlled for couple’s income, education, and individual differences in conscientiousness inasmuch as these variables have been shown to correlate with both socioeconomic conditions as well as the quality of romantic relationships (e.g., Conger et al., 2010; Donnellan et al., 2004; Roberts et al., 2007; Roberts et al., 2014). Also important, we allowed all G1 and G2 variables to correlate in the SEMs to reduce the possibility that the replication in results could be explained by genetic similarities within a single family. Findings Related to the Stress Hypothesis (Hypothesis 1) We hypothesized that greater economic pressure would predict relative increases in hostile behavioral exchanges between romantic.Fering Resilience Hypothesis. To examine the interactive effects in more detail, we estimated the magnitude of the simple slopes (Preacher, Curran, Bauer, 2006) between economic pressure and hostility for different levels of effective problem solving (- 1 SD = low problem-solving couples; mean = average problem-solving couples; + 1 SD = high problemsolving couples). For both G1 and G2, simple slope estimates revealed that the slope for T2 hostility regressed on T1 economic pressure for couples with high levels of effective problem-solving skills (i.e., + 1 SD) was not significantly different than zero (i.e., it was flat; see Figure 4, online supplementary material). That is, for high problem-solving couples, economic pressure did not predict increases in hostile behavioral exchanges over time. For average problem-solving couples, economic pressure predicted moderate relative increasesJ Marriage Fam. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Masarik et al.Pagein couple hostility and low problem-solving couples demonstrated the largest increases in hostility over time as a function of economic pressure. Consistent with Hypothesis 3, when economic pressure was high, low problem-solving couples displayed the greatest relative increases in hostility over time whereas high problem solvers displayed no change in hostility. That is, couples’ effective problem solving provided a source of buffering resilience to economic pressure.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptDiscussionPast research has demonstrated that economic difficulties are concurrently associated with lower perceived romantic relationship quality and stability (e.g., Conger et al., 1990; Dew Yorgason, 2010; Hardie Lucas, 2010; Johnson Booth, 1990; Williamson et al., 2013); yet much less is known about actual behavioral exchanges that unfold over time in response to economic stress. Moreover, we know very little about particular relationship skills or characteristics that might directly compensate or buffer couples from experiencing relationship distress in the context of economic problems. These kinds of empirical investigations are needed to both increase theoretical understanding of the processes involved and to inform prevention and intervention programs that can assist families in difficult economic situations. To guide the development of our study hypotheses, we relied on theoretical predictions outlined by the Family Stress Model (e.g., Conger Conger, 2002; Conger et al., 2010). We used prospective longitudinal data involving two generations of romantic couples and assessed the degree of replication for the hypothesized economic stress and couple resilience processes across generations. In testing our study hypotheses, we controlled for couple’s income, education, and individual differences in conscientiousness inasmuch as these variables have been shown to correlate with both socioeconomic conditions as well as the quality of romantic relationships (e.g., Conger et al., 2010; Donnellan et al., 2004; Roberts et al., 2007; Roberts et al., 2014). Also important, we allowed all G1 and G2 variables to correlate in the SEMs to reduce the possibility that the replication in results could be explained by genetic similarities within a single family. Findings Related to the Stress Hypothesis (Hypothesis 1) We hypothesized that greater economic pressure would predict relative increases in hostile behavioral exchanges between romantic.